Members of Chambers edit or contribute to a number of leading textbooks, please click here for further details. They also write articles for relevant legal journals, with recent examples as follows:
Andrew Brown demystifies the new Insolvency Rules which came into effect on 6 April 2017 in an article for industry body, R3. Andrew outlines some of the main changes and considerations especially as it relates to insolvency practitioners.
In a recent article for R3’s Recovery magazine, Tina Kyriakides discusses freezing orders and explains what you may derive from them, the limitations and the salient details.
Justin Holmes examines whether proceedings on behalf of an estate commenced by a person who later gets a grant of letter of administration can be cured or are a nullity.
The Bank of England’s base rate is 0.25% and high street bank accounts pay little more, so how can interest of 10% over base be achieved? The answer is to be found in CPR Part 36.17(4) and the
In a recent Butterworths Journal of International Banking & Financial Law article, Jeremy Cousins QC looks at the surprising extent to which the Supreme Court was prepared, in BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v LBG Capital No 1 plc and another  Bus LR 725, to take into account commercial background (including
Spencer Bower on Reliance-Based Estoppel, previously titled Estoppel by Representation, is the oldest leading textbook on the doctrines of reliance-based estoppel, by which a party is prevented from changing his position if he has induced another to rely on it such that the other will suffer by that change.
Counsel Magazine have published our CEO, Fiona Fitzgerald’s views on the subject of health and wellbeing at the bar in their latest publication. To read her views
These seminar notes by Dov Ohrenstein consider the impact of recent cases on how the Courts approach the questions of when to imply obligations of good faith and what such obligations mean.
This article by Dov Ohrenstein addresses some of the practical issues that litigators regularly face when contemplating making or accepting CPR Part 36 offers and when arguing about the effect of such offers.
Mark West looks at the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Winterburn v. Bennett  EWCA Civ 482 [link] which concerns the efficacy of Keep Out/Patrons Only-type signage in preventing the acquisition of prescriptive rights and provides advice and a list of practical steps in relation to such signage.