Guest and another (Appellants) v Guest (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 27
On 19 October 2022 the Supreme Court handed down judgement on Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27. Tom Dumont KC and William Moffett, instructed by Robert James and Richie Rees of Thrings, succeeded in overturning (in part) the Court of Appeal’s decision against their clients. Guest v Guest is now the leading case on what the remedy should be […]
Court of Appeal refuse permission to appeal in Clitheroe v Bond [2021] EWHC 1102 (Ch) and [2022] EWHC 2203 (Ch)
On 6 October 2022 the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal the decisions of Mrs Justice Falk in Clitheroe v Bond [2021] EWHC 1102 (Ch) and [2022] EWHC 2203 (Ch) in which she upheld the trial court’s findings that Jean Clitheroe’s 2010 and 2013 wills were invalid by reason of insane delusions. The Court […]
Radcliffe Chambers ranked as a leading set in The Legal 500 UK Bar 2023
We are delighted to be ranked highly in the Legal500 UK Bar 2023. We’d like to give a special congratulations to our juniors, Matthew Mills and Nicholas Macklam who were ranked for the first time. Thank you to all of our clients for your support and congratulations to our barristers, staff and all other chambers ranked this year. Radcliffe […]
Radcliffe Chambers shortlisted for Chambers UK Bar Awards 2022!
We are excited to announce that we have been shortlisted for ‘Client Service Set of the Year’ at the Chambers and Partners UK Bar Awards 2022! These awards recognise a Chambers pre-eminence in the UK and also reflect achievements over the past 12 months. They honour the work of sets and individuals across the country […]
Nicholas Macklam and Matthew Mills receive legal department panel promotions
We are delighted to announce that the Attorney General has promoted Nicholas Macklam and Matthew Mills as panellists to the crown. Nicholas has been promoted to the Attorney General’s B Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown. Matthew has been promoted to the Attorney General’s C Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown. These appointments […]
Commercial and insolvency silk, David Mohyuddin makes Radcliffe Chambers his primary professional home
We are delighted to announce that commercial and insolvency KC, David Mohyuddin has moved his full practice to Radcliffe Chambers. David was called to the bar in 1999 before taking silk in 2016 and becoming a Deputy High Court Judge in 2021. He specialises in corporate and personal insolvency and commercial litigation. David’s recent work […]
Radcliffe Chambers ranked highly in Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2022
We are proud to announce that Radcliffe Chambers and 19 of our members have been ranked in the Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide 2022 for Chancery: Traditional. Congratulations to our barristers and clerks for receiving such fantastic feedback. Radcliffe Chambers was described as a ‘popular choice for significant litigation surrounding trusts, wills and […]
Jamie Cockfield and Louis Grandjouan accept tenancy with Radcliffe Chambers!
We are delighted to announce that our two current pupils have been offered tenancy with us and have accepted. On 1 October 2022 Jamie Cockfield and Louis Grandjouan, will join us as members. Before coming to the Bar, Jamie worked at an energy analytics consultancy founded by Oxford University professors and economists. He received an […]
Kelmanson v Gallagher & De Weyer [2022] EWHC 395 (Ch)
On 1 March 2022, Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Curl KC handed down judgment on Kelmanson v Gallagher & De Weyer [2022] EWHC 395 (Ch), a claim brought by the liquidator of De Weyer Ltd for preferences under s.239 Insolvency Act 1986 and misfeasance under s.212 Insolvency Act and s.172 Companies Act 2006. Andrew […]
Dawson & Ors v Dawson & Ors [2022] EWHC 341 (Ch)
![Dawson & Ors v Dawson & Ors [2022] EWHC 341 (Ch)](https://radcliffechambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/dawson-ors-v-dawson-ors-2022-ewhc-341-ch-scaled-2-1368x648.jpg)
On 18 February 2022, Deputy Master Rhys handed down judgment in Dawson & Ors v Dawson & Ors [2022] EWHC 341 (Ch), a claim to prove a lost will in solemn form, and a counterclaim in proprietary estoppel. The Claimants were the wife and son of the Deceased and the named executors, and the Defendants […]
