Easy Group Judgment

Katie Longstaff successfully acted in the High Court case of EasyGroup Ltd v ER Travel Services Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 2970 (Ch). The case considered whether a person can petition for a company’s restoration and winding up based on a debt assigned in equity when the company was dissolved and the debt had been […]

Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?

Natalie Pratt recently featured in the Local Government Lawyer for her article ‘Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?’ In this piece, Natalie explores the developments in the law following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wolverhampton City Council & Ors v London Gypsies and Travellers & Ors, and highlights key considerations for local authorities […]

Important Decision on Applications under Section 68 Arbitration Act 1996

On 2 October 2025, Paul Mitchell KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) handed down judgment on the claimant’s challenge under Section 68(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (“the Act”) in the case of Macintyre Hudson LLP v. Shiran Wynter [2025] EWHC 2497 (Comm) where Stuart Benzie and Matthew Tonnard acted for the successful […]

Natalie Pratt represents London Borough of Havering in continuation of Traveller injunction

On 13 October, the High Court continued the ‘Traveller injunction’ held by the London Borough of Havering for a further 12 months. The injunction, like many others of its kind, restrains the formation of unauthorised encampments and the depositing of waste on selected sensitive sites within the Borough. Natalie Pratt represented the claimant local authority […]

Pagden & others v Ridgley [2025] EWHC 2674 (Ch)

On 17th October 2025 Mr Justice Foxton handed down judgment on the appeal of the decision of ICC Judge Greenwood in Pagden & others v Ridgley (sub nom Re Orthios Eco Parks (Anglesey) Ltd & Re Orthios Power (Anglesey) Ltd) handed down on 28th November 2024. Foxton J’s decision upholds ICC Judge Greenwood’s “careful and […]

Removing blots from the copybook: third-party rights and HNW Lending Ltd v Lawrence

Zachary Kell and Harmish Mehta are featured in the latest edition of the Journal of International Banking and Financial Law for their analysis of the judgment in HNW Lending Limited v Lawrence [2025] EWHC 908 (Ch) and what that might mean for third party rights in a number of important financial contexts, especially where an […]

Guaranteed Failure, the case of Peter Dunn and Kostas Kazolides

The case of Peter Dunn v Kostas Kazolides [2025] EWHC 2212 (Ch) addresses interesting questions about limitation periods, insolvency, the formal requirements for the execution of deeds, and how variation to the contract between the principal debtor and creditor may discharge a guarantor. Mr Dunn, a former chartered accountant and insolvency practitioner, claimed nearly £9m […]

Case Analysis: Marcus v Marcus [2025] EWHC 1695 (Ch) – LexisNexis EXC0013794

James Anson-Holland is featured in the latest edition of LexisNexis for his analysis of Marcus v Marcus [2025] EWHC 1695 (Ch). The case considers the meaning of ‘children’ as a class of beneficiaries, with the High Court emphasising the importance of context when construing such terms. The full article is available via LexisNexis here. (subscription […]

“The Delorean versus the Polo”

Andrew Brown is featured in the latest edition of LexisNexis Corporate Rescue & Insolvency Journal for his article on “The Delorean versus the Polo”: the respective impacts (or non-impact) of 2020’s introduction of the Corporate Moratorium under Pt A1 and the Mental Health Breathing Space Moratorium. The full article is available via LexisNexis Corporate Rescue […]